ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. The Editors’ Choice

The Editors’ Choice

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology·August 5
AllergyPractice changingAllergic RhinitisAlpha-Gal SyndromeAsthmaAtherosclerosisAtopic DermatitisChronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal PolypsEosinophilic EsophagitisPeanut AllergyEditorial / Editors' Choice (Multi-Study Summary)BiologicMachine Learning / Predictive ModelingOral ImmunotherapyAdultPediatricDupixentDupilumab

Summary

View source

What was studied

This Editors' Choice issue highlights six original studies covering: (1) ML-based prediction of the atopic march in >10,000 children with early-onset atopic dermatitis; (2) CD25 as a marker of activated MCTCs in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps; (3) long-term follow-up (~8–11 years) of the IMPACT peanut oral immunotherapy trial in children aged 1–3 years; (4) rates of new autoimmune diagnoses in children ages 6–17 with atopic disease on vs. off dupilumab (PEDSnet, 10 sites, 4-year follow-up); (5) dupilumab's effect on the EoE transcriptome across pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients; and (6) anti-α-Gal IgG antibodies as a mechanistic link between α-Gal sensitization and atherosclerosis.

Key findings

Highlights across studies: - **Atopic march ML model:** Simplified models using routine early-life clinical features accurately predicted moderate-to-severe persistent asthma/allergic rhinitis by ages 5–11. - **Peanut OIT (IMPACT follow-up):** 80% of children who received pnOIT only (group A, n=40) were eating peanut at follow-up; 35% of group A reported peanut reactions since IMPACT; IgG4:IgE ratio remained higher in the pnOIT group vs. placebo years later. - **Dupilumab & autoimmunity in children:** Cutaneous autoimmune diagnoses (mainly psoriasis and alopecia areata) were ~2 per 1,000 children/year higher in the dupilumab group; no significant differences in endocrine, GI, or rheumatologic autoimmune diagnoses. - **EoE transcriptome:** Dupilumab normalized >1,300 dysregulated EoE genes (eosinophil and non-eosinophil pathways) across all age groups, sustained on treatment. - **α-Gal IgG & atherosclerosis:** Anti-α-Gal IgG formed immune complexes with α-Gal–bearing LDL, enhancing macrophage uptake and foam cell formation in vitro.

Study limitations

- The atopic march ML study and dupilumab/autoimmunity study are both EHR-based and observational, limiting causal inference and subject to coding/ascertainment bias. - The IMPACT long-term follow-up enrolled only 78 of 146 original participants (54%), introducing potential selection bias. - The α-Gal/atherosclerosis mechanism was demonstrated in vitro only; in vivo cardiovascular relevance remains unproven.

Clinical implications

Early-life clinical features (respiratory symptoms, allergy meds, sensitization) can be used to flag young children with eczema for closer monitoring before asthma develops. Children on dupilumab should continue standard longitudinal monitoring for cutaneous autoimmune conditions such as psoriasis and alopecia areata, while being reassured that systemic autoimmune risks appear low.

Caveats

  • Level of evidence reflects the strongest individual study design cited (validated ML cohort study / long-term RCT follow-up); other highlighted studies range from cross-sectional to in vitro mechanistic.
  • Only a publisher landing/navigation page was provided — no abstract, methods, results, or conclusions are accessible. The paper title is 'The Editors' Choice,' which is likely a curated editorial or highlights section rather than an original research article. No structured content, study design, population, or outcomes could be extracted. Full text access is required to generate meaningful summaries or tags.
  • The IMPACT peanut OIT follow-up had a 54% participation rate, which may affect generalizability of long-term outcomes.
Show all 11
  • The paper provided contains only a DOI, URL, journal name, and publication date — no abstract, methods, results, or any other substantive content. Structured summaries and tags cannot be generated without source text. Please provide the full text or abstract of the article for accurate extraction.
  • The paper provided contains only metadata (DOI, URL, journal, and publication date) with no abstract, body text, or results. No clinical content could be extracted. Please provide the full text or abstract to generate meaningful summaries and tags.
  • The paper provided contains only metadata (title, DOI, journal, and publication date) with no abstract, methods, results, or discussion. No structured summary, tags, or evidence-based content can be extracted. Please provide the full paper text to enable meaningful analysis.
  • The provided source text contains only metadata (DOI, URL, journal name, and publication date) with no abstract, body text, methods, results, or conclusions. Structured summaries and tags cannot be extracted without substantive content. The paper is titled 'The Editors' Choice,' which is typically an editorial or curated highlight piece — its specific focus, population, intervention, and results are entirely unknown from the information provided.
  • The provided source text contains only metadata (DOI, URL, journal name, and publication date) with no abstract, body text, or results. All summary fields and tags have been left null or empty because no content can be extracted or inferred without speculating. Please provide the full paper text for a complete structured extraction.
  • The title 'The Editors' Choice' is a generic editorial section label, not a specific study title. It is unclear which article(s) or topic(s) are being referenced.
  • The α-Gal/foam cell findings are in vitro only; clinical cardiovascular implications should not be overstated.
  • This is an Editors' Choice summary article covering six distinct original studies, not a single primary study — tags and sample sizes reflect the most prominent individual studies cited, not a single pooled population.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the latest editors' choice studies in allergy and clinical immunology?What are the editors' choice articles in allergy and immunology in 2026?What are the latest practice-changing findings in allergy and clinical immunology 2026?Which children with early eczema are most likely to develop asthma or allergic rhinitis?What are the latest editors' choice articles in allergy and clinical immunology?What are the most recent editors' choice articles in allergy and clinical immunology?What are the editors' choice articles in allergy and clinical immunology 2026?What topics are featured in recent JACI editors' choice articles?What are the long-term outcomes of peanut oral immunotherapy started before age 3?What recent practice-changing findings have been published in JACI?What are the latest practice-changing findings in allergy and immunology?What are the top clinical findings in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology this year?What practice-changing studies have been published in JACI in 2026?What are recent practice-changing findings in allergy and immunology journals?Recent practice-changing studies in allergy and clinical immunologyWhat are current highlights in allergy and immunology research 2026?What topics are trending in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology in 2026?What are the latest clinical guidelines in allergy and immunology?How do I find full text of paywalled JACI articles for clinical review?Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology top research highlights 2026Does dupilumab cause autoimmune disease in children with atopic dermatitis or asthma?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Sample Size
n=10,000
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next