ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Systemic therapy, gastrectomy, cytoreductive surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic therapy alone for gastric cancer with limited peritoneal metastases (PERISCOPE II): final results of a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial after an unplanned commissioned interim analysis
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Systemic therapy, gastrectomy, cytoreduc…

Systemic therapy, gastrectomy, cytoreductive surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic therapy alone for gastric cancer with limited peritoneal metastases (PERISCOPE II): final results of a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial after an unplanned commissioned interim analysis

The Lancet Oncology·July 8
OncologyPractice changingGastric CancerPeritoneal MetastasesRandomized Controlled TrialCytoreductive SurgeryHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapySystemic ChemotherapyAdultDocetaxelOxaliplatin

Summary

View source

What was studied

The PERISCOPE II trial randomised 102 adults with gastric adenocarcinoma and limited peritoneal metastases (Peritoneal Cancer Index <7 or positive cytology) who had not progressed on ≥3 cycles of systemic therapy, to either continued systemic therapy alone (n=51) or gastrectomy plus cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC with oxaliplatin and docetaxel (n=51), with overall survival as the primary endpoint (median follow-up 67 months).

Key findings

No survival benefit was seen with surgery plus HIPEC: median OS was 15.7 months in the experimental group vs 16.6 months in the standard group (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.69–1.74; p=0.70). The surgical arm had substantially more harm: grade ≥3 adverse events in 42% vs 20%, serious adverse events in 44% vs 6%, and three treatment-related deaths (all in the surgical arm) within 100 days.

Study limitations

- Trial closed prematurely after an unplanned interim futility analysis, leaving it underpowered for its original sample size target. - Small total sample (n=102) limits precision of subgroup conclusions. - Restricted to European tertiary centres, limiting generalisability to lower-volume settings.

Clinical implications

Do not add gastrectomy with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC to systemic therapy for gastric cancer with limited peritoneal metastases — it offers no survival gain and substantially increases serious complications and treatment-related mortality. Systemic therapy alone remains the standard of care for this population.

Caveats

  • Level of evidence tagged as 2 (phase 3 RCT closed early); some would classify early-stopped RCTs at a lower level due to imprecision.
  • The older adult subgroup is not separately reported; median age was 60 years so most participants were general adults.
  • Trial was stopped early due to an unplanned commissioned futility interim analysis, which introduces the possibility of an underpowered estimate; the confidence interval is wide and does not exclude modest benefit or harm.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the current evidence for HIPEC in gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases?How does the PERISCOPE II result compare with GASTRIPEC-I and other gastric cancer HIPEC trials?What systemic therapy regimens are recommended for gastric cancer with limited peritoneal metastases?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
The Lancet Oncology
Sample Size
n=102
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next